| 
			 NAFTA Superhighway Poll |
		 	May 30, 2008 |       
			
			Digg This | 
		
				
				POLL SAYS "NAFTA SUPERHIGHWAY" SHOULD NOT BE 
				BUILT
				
				Americans oppose the construction of a "NAFTA Superhighway" 
				according to a poll conducted by The Conservative Caucus (TCC). 
				Construction of the first segment, known as the Trans-Texas 
				Corridor (TTC), was opposed by 97.5%. The full "North American 
				Supercorridor" (its official name) would run from the Mexican 
				port of Lazaro Cardenas through the central United States and 
				into Canada.
				There was also 100% opposition to leasing the TTC to a 
				Spanish corporation, which would receive the tolls of those who 
				drive on it. The use of low-wage Mexican truckers and 
				dock-workers was criticized by 86%, and 99% considered it to be 
				an unwise policy to allow the NAFTA-style lack of inspections 
				for trucks arriving from Mexico.
				There was 98% opposition to a North American Union (NAU) of 
				the United States, Mexico and Canada. Opposition to a North 
				American currency (replacing dollars and pesos) reached 99.5%.
				A unanimous 100% believed that the President should not move 
				toward a North American Union and 99.5% said they would be less 
				likely to support a politician who supported the NAU.
				The poll was conducted by mail during March of 2008 with 
				about 4,000 responses.
				The Conservative 
				Caucus (TCC) is a grass-roots public policy action 
				organization, formed in 1974. TCC organized the 
				Coalition to Block the North American Union in 2006. It was 
				active in defeating the SALT II Treaty, repealing the 
				Catastrophic Coverage Act, blocking the Clinton health-care 
				takeover, and impeaching President Clinton.
				
				
		
		| 
			 Space-Based Defense |
		 	May 29, 2008 |       
			
			Digg This | 
		
				
				SDI REMAINS ESSENTIAL TO DEFENSE OF U.S.
				
				I was introduced in 1979 to the concept of Global Ballistic 
				Missile Defense by my colleague, retired Brigadier General 
				Albion Knight.
				I immediately held briefings with leaders of other 
				organizations, including Ed Feulner of the Heritage Foundation 
				and John Fisher of the American Security Council.
				Subsequently, I embarked on a 50-state campaign to promote 
				what became to be known as SDI. In the course of the campaign, I 
				enlisted Phyllis Schlafly and retired Lt. Gen. Daniel O. Graham 
				in our effort.
				Although full development and deployment of a Global 
				Ballistic Missile Defense never became a reality during the 
				Presidency of Ronald Reagan, thanks to people like Ambassador 
				Henry Cooper, who ran the SDI office under the first President 
				Bush, we’re finally making some progress.
				Please review Phyllis Schlafly’s important comments [The 
				Phyllis Schlafly Report, Vol. 41, No. 9, April 2008] about a 
				space-based defense for America:
				"The U.S. Navy gave Ronald Reagan a dramatic 25th anniversary 
				gift on February 21. A Navy missile raced into outer space and 
				destroyed an orbiting satellite, thereby providing new proof of 
				the vision President Reagan proclaimed in his then-sensational 
				televised address on March 23, 1983. 
				"While the Navy SM-3 missile didn't knock down an incoming 
				nuclear missile, the direct hit on a satellite proved again that 
				our anti-missile technology is mature and reliable, and that an 
				effective anti-missile system is within our grasp. Traveling at 
				6,000 miles per hour after being launched from a cruiser in the 
				Pacific, the SM-3 missile was even more accurate than anyone had 
				predicted because it struck precisely at the satellite's 
				dangerous fuel tank. 
				"The successful kill of the satellite also confirmed the 
				ability of the SM-3 to intercept at a higher elevation than had 
				ever been tested before. It revalidated the Bush 
				Administration's expenditure of $10 billion a year on 
				anti-missile defenses. This direct hit comes on the heels of a 
				particularly impressive track record of successful anti-missile 
				tests in 2007. Since 2005, the Missile Defense Agency has scored 
				21 successful space interceptions in 22 tests. 
				"The so-called world community, egged on by U.S. pacifists 
				and disarmament professionals, grumbled and sputtered because 
				the United States dared to knock out a satellite. Actually, 
				there was a very persuasive reason for our government to take 
				immediate action against this particular satellite. It had 
				failed in its mission and was edging closer to Earth carrying a 
				large tank of toxic fuel that would be harmful to many people if 
				it crashed into a populated area. Our government acted properly 
				to protect the world against such an unnecessary disaster. 
				"This demonstration of U.S. anti-satellite capability also 
				had a useful side effect. It signaled Communist China that we 
				have anti-satellite technology and power. China shocked the 
				world on January 11, 2007 by conducting the first successful 
				test of an anti-satellite weapon. In its usual disregard for the 
				health of humankind, China's test left 2,500 pieces of debris in 
				space spread out in a way that poses a danger to manned and 
				unmanned spacecraft. 
				"U.S. officials recognized China's action as a new strategic 
				threat. Killing a communications satellite could knock out U.S. 
				military and civilian communications systems. 
				"In his 1983 address, Reagan announced that he was ‘launching 
				an effort which holds the promise of changing the course of 
				human history.’ Indeed, it did. His speech extricated America 
				from the defeatist McNamara-Kissinger-Nixon-Ford-Carter strategy 
				of Mutual Assured Destruction, known descriptively by its 
				acronym MAD. 
				"The MAD strategy postulated that our only hope of avoiding 
				nuclear war was by threatening massive retaliation and killing 
				as many enemy people as we could. "Morning-in-America" Reagan 
				offered the contrary vision of hope. 
				" ‘Wouldn't it be better to save lives than to avenge them?’ 
				he said. "What if we could intercept and destroy strategic 
				ballistic missiles before they reached our own soil or that of 
				our allies?" 
				"Reagan thus added the necessary fourth leg to his strategy 
				of Peace Through Strength. It encompassed not only diplomacy, 
				deterrence and offensive weapons, but also defensive weapons. 
				This made eminently good sense to the American people, who fully 
				understand that battle requires both a sword and a shield. 
				Conservatives had been pleading for an anti-missile defense 
				system for more than 20 years. 
				"The whole disarmament/pacifist crowd attacked Reagan 
				unmercifully for his determination to defend America with 
				defensive as well as offensive weapons. Ted Kennedy led the pack 
				by ridiculing Reagan's plan as Star Wars. 
				"Reagan's opponents criticized him on every front, claiming 
				an anti-missile system can't work because it requires hitting a 
				bullet with a bullet. This new test should finally put to rest 
				the false claims that it won't work. 
				"Now, with the benefit of hindsight, we know that it was 
				Reagan's determination to push forward with what became known as 
				his Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) that won the Cold War. 
				SDI was the centerpiece of his strategy. 
				"At the Geneva and Reykjavik Summits, Mikhail Gorbachev 
				offered every carrot and stick in his arsenal to persuade or 
				intimidate Reagan into abandoning SDI. When Reagan refused, 
				Gorbachev realized the jig was up for the Soviet empire and its 
				delusions of world conquest because the Soviets could not 
				compete with the U.S. military-economic powerhouse. 
				"Reagan's SDI, so courageously proposed in 1983, ultimately 
				enabled him to defeat the Evil Empire without firing a shot. We 
				know the system works, and it's just as necessary in the 
				post-9/11 world as in the days of the Soviet threat."
				
				
		
				
				HILLARY SWITCHED FROM BARRY GOLDWATER TO KARL 
				MARX
				
				I first met Hillary Rodham in 1964 when she was a "Goldwater 
				girl" at the New England model Republican Presidential 
				nominating convention, over which I presided.
				Several hundred students from all parts of New England took 
				part in the convention, which ultimately chose Barry Goldwater 
				to be the 1964 standard bearer for the Republican Party.
				I was in charge of the convention because of two key 
				positions which I held: Chairman of the Republican Party of 
				Boston and State Chairman of the College Republican Federation.
				The keynote speaker at our convention was a young Congressman 
				from Kansas by the name of Bob Dole.
				Hillary switched sides not too long after the convention, at 
				which she had backed Goldwater. She truly went off the deep end.
				
				
		
		| 
			 California Memories |
		 	May 23, 2008 |       
			
			Digg This | 
		
				
				CALIFORNIA MEMORIES
				
				John Gizzi’s recent column in "Human Events" (4/21/08, P.18) 
				concerning the death of Joe Shell reminded me of my late friend, 
				Rus Walton.
				Walton, who was co-anchor with Tom Brokaw on a Los Angeles TV 
				news program, was my inspiration for founding the U.S. Taxpayers 
				Alliance (USTA), of which he was the first President.
				Joe Shell sought the Republican nomination for Governor of 
				California in 1962. Rus, a former official of the National 
				Association of Manufacturers, was his campaign manager.
				Shell himself was a great conservative who had been a 
				football superstar at the University of Southern California 
				where he was captain of the undefeated 1939 team that had gone 
				to the Rose Bowl, joined the U.S. Army Air Corps, and was a 
				flight instructor during 1942 and 1943. In 1944, he enlisted in 
				the Navy and saw action as a pilot in World War II.
				Gizzi wrote: "Like most of the interviews with him, my 
				session with Joe Shell for a 1992 profile began 
				with my mentioning to the former state assemblyman and longtime 
				California conservative how he ‘ran against Richard Nixon" for 
				the Republican nomination for governor of the Golden State back 
				in 1962.
				" ‘I beg your pardon,’ Shell admonished me. ‘That’s not 
				accurate. Nixon ran against me!’ The Bakersfield oilman 
				went on to remind me how he had been actively campaigning for 
				the GOP nomination for governor when Nixon, little more than a 
				year after losing the presidency in a squeaker, decided to enter 
				the gubernatorial race. Shell blitzed the state, piloting his 
				own Beechcraft Bonanza airplane and denouncing ‘calling people 
				liberals when they’re basically socialists,’ as he told Time 
				magazine that year. Flanked by pompon-bearing cheerleaders known 
				as ‘Shell’s Belles’ and helped by vigorous volunteer workers 
				under the leadership of campaign manager Rus Walton (a former 
				National Association of Manufacturers official), Shell charged 
				that Nixon was merely using the governorship as a stopping place 
				on his way back to national politics.
				"Amid charges that he was the candidate of the John Birch 
				Society, Shell said no, he wasn’t a Bircher, but there were a 
				lot of fine people in the JBS and he was proud to have their 
				support. (Nixon repeatedly denounced the society).
				"Shell lost to Nixon by 2 to 1, and asked Nixon for promises 
				to slash the state budget by $200 million if elected and give 
				Shell backers one-third of the state’s delegation to the next 
				GOP national convention. Nixon refused. Nixon, of course, went 
				on to lose that fall to Democratic Gov. (1958-66) Edmund G. 
				"Pat" Brown—prompting the former Vice President’s famous 
				‘last press conference’ in which he told reporters, ‘You won’t 
				have Nixon to kick around anymore.’ Of course, things turned out 
				quite differently.
				"When Shell died on April 11, that campaign was the event 
				that news reports primarily remembered. The headline in the 
				Mercury News was almost universally repeated: ‘Joe Shell, 
				California legislator who challenged Nixon, dead at 89.’ But 
				Shell’s eventful life showed he was much more than that.
				"A football superstar at the University of Southern 
				California, Shell was captain of the undefeated 1939 team that 
				had gone to the Rose Bowl. Eschewing a career in pro football, 
				Shell joined the U.S. Army Air Corps and was a flight instructor 
				from 1942-43. In 1944, he enlisted in the Navy and saw action as 
				a pilot in World War II. Following his discharged, he settled in 
				Kern County and launched a successful oil-drilling business. In 
				1954, he won election to the state assembly and later became the 
				conservative point man against Gov. Brown’s big-spending 
				initiatives.
				"Following his defeat at the hands of Nixon, Shell never 
				sought office again. But he and his supporters remained active 
				in the state party and helped Ronald Reagan win nomination and 
				election as governor in 1966. He became a part-time lobbyist for 
				his fellow independent oil producers and was a generous 
				contributor to conservative causes and candidates. Shell’s wife 
				Mary was elected mayor of their hometown of Bakersfield and, in 
				1984, won a seat on the Kern County Board of Supervisors over 
				the son-in-law of United Farm Workers leader Cesar 
				Chavez. That same year, Shell’s son Joe Jr. lost a race for 
				the state assembly to Democrat Tom Hayden.
				"Shell’s longtime friend, Republican Gov. (1982-90) George
				Deukmejian, persuaded the Bakersfield man to take a seat 
				on the state Agriculture Labor Relations Board in 1989. Shell 
				quit two years later, and the reason he gave was vintage Shell: 
				he was tired to being paid for doing almost nothing, he said."
				
				
		
VISIT TCC’S NAU WAR ROOM
				
				
I 
				am pleased to announce the launch of a brand new TCC-sponsored 
				website, called the "NAU War Room" (www.NAUWarRoom.org).
				This site will serve as the THE national headquarters of our 
				ongoing campaign to expose and halt America’s absorption into a 
				"North American Union" (NAU) with Canada and Mexico. It will 
				also serve as the main site for the campaign to prevent the 
				construction of any and all NAFTA Superhighways.
				I encourage you to visit our NAU War Room today and on a 
				regular basis in the future. You will find what you need to know 
				about TCC’s effort to defeat this New World Order scheme and 
				what you and others can do to help. Vital, up-to-date 
				information (e.g., our April 21 press conference from the 
				site of the most-recent SPP meeting between President Bush, 
				Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and Mexican President 
				Felipe Calderon) can be accessed from this site, along with 
				other related breaking news stories and events.
				Please be sure to also e-mail the NAU War Room web address to 
				as many friends and relatives as you can. The proponents of the 
				NAU and the NAFTA Superhighways are counting on public ignorance 
				and apathy to help them enrich themselves at the expense of our 
				liberty and independence.
				It’s up to us to stop them.
				www.NAUWarRoom.org